“Myth is more instructive than history”: (Re)constructions of Biblical Myths in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve
Keywords:
Margaret Atwood, Angela Carter, Biblical myth, speculative fictionAbstract
The paper deals with The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood and The Passion of New Eve by Angela Carter. Both writers show dystopian regimes which reconstruct Biblical myths since, as it is suggested in their fiction, totalitarian states abuse myths to represent women as passive victims and objects of desire and rescue. And because demythologizing involves remythologizing, Atwood and Carter attempt not only to refuse the representations of the past literary and mythological tradition but also to declare subjectivity for their heroines; women are represented in Nancy Roberts’ words “as rescuers rather than victims” . Margaret Atwood uses the genre of speculative fiction to depict the nightmarish Gilead, a fundamentalist totalitarian regime reconstructed from patriarchal narratives of the Bible and American Puritanism. The leaders of Gilead value women for their reproductive function as ‘two-legged wombs’. Atwood’s protagonist, Offred, although she has no real power to rebel against patriarchal prescriptions, claims her body and her memory as her own territory. Through her narrative she undermines Gilead’s myth of the silent passivity of women. Offered not only survives the oppression, she also re-writes the story of ‘walking ovaries’ into her own story of identity, denying the role of nameless Handmaid. In Angela Carter’s speculative fiction The Passion of New Eve, the Biblical myth of the creation of Eve from Adam’s body is remythologized by Mother, the leader of a group of militant feminists. A British man, Evelyn, is kidnapped and transformed through surgery into “the new Eve” by Mother, who is a genius surgeon as well. I focus here on intertextuality, which offers Atwood and Carter a strategy for reconstructing the gaps inherent in Biblical myths related to reproduction, creation of woman and infertility.
References
Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. (1985) London: Vintage, 1996.
Barthes, Roland. Mythologies. London: Vintage, 2000.
Blake, William. “Milton”. Eaves, Morris, Robert Essick, and Joseph Viscomi, eds. The William Blake Archive. Lib. Of Cong., 28 Sept. 2007. Web. 28 Nov. 2009. <http://www.blakearchive.org/blake
Bunyan, John. Pilgrim’s Progress. Christian Classics Ethereal Library. Web. 28 Nov. 2009. < http://www.ccel.org/ccel/bunyan/pilgrim.toc.html>.
Carrol, Robert and Prickett, Stephen. The Bible: Authorized King James Version. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Carruthers, Jo. “Literature”. In: Sawyer, John F. A. (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to the Bible and Culture. Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell, 2006. 253-268.
Carter, Angela. The Passion of New Eve. (1977) London: Virago 1982.
Carter, Angela. The Sadeian Woman. An Exercise in Cultural History. London: Virago, 1979.
Carter, Angela. “Notes from the Front Line.” On Gender and Writing. Ed. Michelene Wandor. London: Pandora Press, 1983. 69-77.
Fisch, Harold. New Stories for Old: Biblical Patterns in the Novel. Basingtoke: Macmillan 1998.
Frye, Northrop. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. London: Ark Paperbacks [1982] 1983.
Frye, Northrop. Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. London: Penguin, [1957] 2002.
Frye, Northrop. Double Vision: Language and Meaning in Religion. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1991.
Frye, Northrop and Michael Dolzani. Words with Power: Being a Second Study of The Bible and Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, [1990] 2008.
Holquist, Michael. Dialogism. London: Routledge, [1990] 2002.
Howells, Coral Ann. Margaret Atwood. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire and London: Macmillan Press Ltd, 1996.
Kerchy, Anna. “Fantastic Freakings: Decomposing Narrative and Deformed Femininity in Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve.”.Palimpszeszt. http://magyar-iradalom.elte.hu/palimszest/24_szam/09.html. Web. 19 Apr. 2009.
Lauter, Estella. Women as Mythmakers: Poetry and Visual Art by Twentieth-Century Women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.
Lyotard, Jean François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester UP, 1992.
Mahoney, Elizabeth. ‘“But Elsewhere?’: The Future of Fantasy in Heroes and Villains”. The Infernal Desires of Angela Carter: Fiction, Femininity, Feminism, ed. Joseph Bristow and Trev Lynn Broughton. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman, 1997.
Műller, Anja. Angela Carter. Identity Constructed/Deconstructed. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter, 1997.
Műller, Klaus Peter. “Re-constructions of Reality in Margaret Atwood’s Literature: A Constructionist Approach”. Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Nischik, Reingard. New York: Camden House, 2000. 229-258.
Peach, Linden. Angela Carter. Houndmills, Basingtoke, Hampshire and London: Macmillan Press, 1998.
Prickett, Stephen. Words and the Word: Language, Poetics and the Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1986] 1988.
Roberts, Nancy. Schools of Sympathy. Gender and Identification through the Novel. Montreal & Kingston, London, Buffalo: McGill-Queen’s University Press, The University of British Columbia, 1997.
Sawyer, John F. A. (ed.) The Blackwell Companion to the Bible and Culture. Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell, 2006.
Schneidau, Herbert N. Sacred Discontent: The Bible and Western Tradition. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1976.
Sim, Stuart (ed.). The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.
Suvin, Darko. “On the Poetics of the Science Fiction Genre.” College English 34.3 (1972): 372-382.
Staels, Hilde. Margaret Atwood’s Novels. A Study of Narrative Discourse. Tűbingen and Basel: A Francke Verlag, 1995.
Sternberg, Meir. The Poetics of Biblical Narrative. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. The New American Bible. http. Accessed. 3 July 2009.
Wilson, Sharon Rose. “Mythological Intertexts in Margaret Atwood’s Works”. Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact. Ed. Nischik, Reingard. New York: Camden House, 2000. 215-228.