The Social Impact of the American Eugenics Movement

Authors

  • Hedvika Pohlová

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46585/absa.2022.15.2437

Keywords:

eugenics, American eugenics movement, negative eugenics, the feebleminded, new immigrants

Abstract

This paper explores the American eugenics movement and the manifestation of its ideas in society. American
eugenics thought is mainly characterized by its strong focus on the elimination of socially undesirable individuals. The two main targets of American eugenics, the feebleminded and new immigrants, are discussed in this text, with the main focus legally implemented measures such as forced sterilization and restrictions on immigration, along with the legacy of these actions. This examination of American eugenics points out a clear continuity with Nazi ideology, an association which in the end also contributed to the fall of the official American eugenics movement. To explore the theoretical framework of the movement, works by Charles Davenport and Madison Grant are examined.

References

Allen, Garland E. “Eugenics and American Social History, 1880–1950.” Genome 31, no. 2 (1989): 885–89. https://doi.org/10.1139/g89–156.

Allen, Garland E. “The Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, 1910–1940: An Essay in Institutional History.” Osiris 2 (1986): 225–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/368657.

An Act to Regulate Immigration, 1882.

An Act to Regulate the Immigration of Aliens To, and the Residence of Aliens In, the United States, 1917.

Bashford, Alison, and Philippa Levine. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Baynton, Douglas. Defectives in the Land: Disability and Immigration in the Age of Eugenics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016.

Black, Edwin. War against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race. Washington, DC: Dialog Press, 2012.

Carlson, Elof Axel. The Unfit: A History of a Bad Idea. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001.

Cohen, Adam. Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. New York: Penguin Press, 2017.

Darwin, Charles. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray, 1859.

Davenport, Charles Benedict. Heredity in Relation to Eugenics. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1911.

DeCorte, Ted L. “Menace of Undesirables: The Eugenics Movement During the Progressive Era.” Las Vegas: University of Nevada, 1978.

Degler, Carl N. In Search of Human Nature: Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

Dolmage, Jay. Disabled upon Arrival: Eugenics, Immigration, and the Construction of Race and Disability. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2018.

Galton, Francis. “Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims.” American Journal of Sociology 10, no. 1 (1904): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/211280.

Galton, Francis. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. London: Macmillian, 1883.

Galton, Francis. Memories of My Life. London: Methuen, 1908.

Gillette, Aaron. Eugenics and the Nature-Nurture Debate in the Twentieth Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

Grant, Madison. The Passing of the Great Race: Or the Racial Basis of European History. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1919.

Jackman, Tom. “Judge Suggests Drug-Addicted Woman Get Sterilized before Sentencing, and She Does.” The Washington Post, April 1, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/true-crime/wp/2018/02/08/judge-suggests-drug-addicted-woman-get-sterilized-beforesentencing-and-she-does/.

Kevles, Daniel J. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1986.

Kline, Wendy. Building a Better Race: Gender, Sexuality, and Eugenics from the Turn of the Century to the Baby Boom. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 2001.

Kühl Stefan. The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.

Levine, Philippa. Eugenics: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. Lombardo, Paul A. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.

Markfield, Miriam H. “A More Perfect Union: Eugenics in America.” NAELA, 2019. https://www.naela.org/NewsJournalOnline/OnlineJournalArticles/OnlineApril2019/Eugenics.aspx?subid=1063.

Meloni, Maurizio. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity From Eugenics to Epigenetics. London: Palgrave Macmillian, 2016.

Norrgard, Karen. “Human Testing, the Eugenics Movement, and IRBs.” Scitable. Nature Education, 2008. https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/human-testing-the-eugenics-movementand-irbs-724/.

Paul, Diane B. “Darwin, Social Darwinism and Eugenics.” Essay. In The Cambridge Companion to Darwin, edited by Johnatan Hodge and Gregory Radick, 214–39. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Phillips, Craig. “Filmmaker Exposes Shocking Pattern of Illegal Sterilizations in Women’s Prisons.” PBS, November 2020. https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/blog/filmmaker-exposesshocking-pattern-of-illegal-sterilizations-in-womens-prisons/.

Ross, Edward A. “The Causes of Race Superiority.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 18, no. 1 (1901): 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620101800104.

Supreme Court of the United States. Buck v. Bell Decision. May 2, 1927.

Cohn, Erika, director. The Belly of the Beast. PBS, 2020. 82 min.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Pohlová, H. (2022). The Social Impact of the American Eugenics Movement. American &Amp; British Studies Annual, 15, 148–163. https://doi.org/10.46585/absa.2022.15.2437

Issue

Section

Student Contributions